IP at the Supreme Court Series:Jack Daniels Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC
March 22 | 5:00 - 6:30pm EDT | Hybrid | NT01 | Reception to Follow
Moderated byProfessor Christine Farley
51勛圖 Washington College of Law regularly invites counsel of record and counsel for selected amici to offer post-argument reflections in intellectual property (and related) cases heard by the Supreme Court. These events are held on the afternoon of oral argument before the Court.
ISSUE
Issues: (1) Whether humorous use of anothers trademark as ones own on a commercial product is subject to the Lanham Acts traditional likelihood-of-confusion analysis,, or instead receives heightened First Amendment protection from trademark-infringement claims; and (2) whether humorous use of anothers mark as ones own on a commercial product is noncommercial and thus bars as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act,.
捩插捧楚郭梆釦啦釦泭
Bennett Evan Cooper
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Counsel For Respondent
Prof. Rebeccah Tushnet
Harvard Law School
Amicus Brief for Law Professors in Support of Respondent
Paul Levy
Public Citizen
Amicus brief for Dan McCall, Sky Shatz, & Don Stewart in support of Respondent
Edward T. Colbert
Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Amicus brief for Constellation Brands, Inc. in support of Petitioner
Megan K. Bannigan
Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Amicus Brief for IP Law Professors in Support of Neither Party
Carrie A. Hefte
Wells Fargo & Company(retired)
Amicus brief for INTA in support of neither party
ALL BRIEFS AVAILABLE ON SCOTUSblog:
UPDATE:
Decision
Accommodation Request
If you would like to request a disability-related accommodation or accessibility information, please contact PIJIPat pijip@wcl.american.edu.Requests should be made two weeks prior to event date.